https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92805
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #9)
> (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #4)
> > Tested.
>
> I tried to resurrect your patch, but it partly misses on the following:
>
> integer, parameter :: ck = kind ("a") ! default character kind
> print *, ck_"a"
> print *, ck _"a"
> print *, ck_ "a"
> print *, 1_"a"
> print *, 1 _"a"
> print *, 1_ "a"
> end
>
> pr92805.f90:3:19:
>
> 3 | print *, ck _"a"
> | 1
> Error: Syntax error in PRINT statement at (1)
> pr92805.f90:4:20:
>
> 4 | print *, ck_ "a"
> | 1
> Error: Syntax error in PRINT statement at (1)
>
> For some reason we detect only some of the syntax violations.
Thanks for taking a look. I completely forgot about
character kinds. I wonder if the difference/problem
is caused by location. Numeric kinds are suffixes on
the literal constant while character kinds are prefixes.
