https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- So instead of doing *((T[0:] *)&a[ubound])[-idx] for accesses do a[ubound - idx]?
rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs Wed, 25 Aug 2021 03:20:10 -0700
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- So instead of doing *((T[0:] *)&a[ubound])[-idx] for accesses do a[ubound - idx]?