https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100061
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Tobias S. Josefowitz from comment #10) > Is the 10.4 milestone really applicable here, or might that in practice be > something that would cause this bug to go somewhat unnoticed? The 10.4 milestone makes this bug appear in the list of important regressions for the GCC 10, GCC 11 and GCC 12 (master) branches so it is exactly correct.
