https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52288
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2021-08-06
Summary|Trouble with operator?: and |operator?: and lambdas
|lambdas |error message could be
| |better
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #6)
> G++ will now say
>
> wa.C:3:17: error: operands to ?: have different types ‘main(int,
> char**)::<lambda(int)>’ and ‘main(int, char**)::<lambda(int)>’
>
> I think that addresses the ?: part of this issue. I'll leave it open for
> now in case we want to keep it as a question about how to name lambdas in
> error messages. It seems to me that we might want to omit the function
> scope if we're currently in the same function. Do we want to give them
> numbers to distinguish them?
This is how clang does their names of the lambdas in error message:
<source>:4:17: error: incompatible operand types ('(lambda at <source>:4:19)'
and '(lambda at <source>:5:9)')
void* p = b ? [argc](int i){ return i; } :
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Maybe we can do the same.
