https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100810

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
  # i_16 = PHI <i_25(D)(21), i_17(9)>
....
  _22 = (unsigned int) i_16;
  _48 = -_22;
  _49 = _39 - _22;
  h_lsm.23_29 = (int) _49;

Somehow or another h gets its value from i which causes the incorrect code.
ccp is not at fault.

Reply via email to