https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95004
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Static array of base |using the wrong pointer to
|classes member pointers |member for base classes
| |with two bases
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2021-08-01
Known to fail| |6.4.0
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. To show it is not a problem with templates and just pointer to
members and not using aliases either.
Take:
struct base {
int value1;
};
struct base0 {
int value;
};
struct derived: base0, base {
typedef int derived::* pointer_type ;
static constexpr pointer_type m = &base0::value;
static constexpr pointer_type m1 = &base::value1;
};
static_assert(derived::m == &base0::value,"");
static_assert(derived::m != &base::value1,"");
static_assert(derived::m1 != &base0::value,"");
static_assert(derived::m1 == &base::value1,"");
Basically the conversion from "int derived::*" to "int *base::" (or "int
*base0") is going wrong.
