https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99728
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- This has the situation improved but the aggregate copy and one dependent store are still not moved (so not fixed).
rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs Wed, 07 Jul 2021 05:10:05 -0700
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99728
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- This has the situation improved but the aggregate copy and one dependent store are still not moved (so not fixed).