https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101258
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I never said to read the standard though. I said to use cppreference.com I repeat, cppreference.com is not the standard. What you are looking for is cppreference.com. (In reply to Christopher Yeleighton from comment #12) > can still hardly accept that we are such a failure in this area (I believe > that if we have time to implement things, we should also dedicate some to > describe them). Why don't you contribute improvements then?
