https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101079
--- Comment #4 from xiao....@compiler-dev.com <xiao....@compiler-dev.com> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Under discussions in OpenMP language committee, but the latest proposal is > that this is invalid, you need to increment the linear variable by > linear-step in the body of the construct. If that is voted into 5.2, we > won't be changing GCC for this which always assumed that is the case. Not > incrementing it in the body means that the testcase will behave > significantly differently with -fno-openmp, and also result in worse > generated code for many cases that do increment the linear variables. Hi Jakub, can you tell me where they discuss the proposal? I am very interested in the new features introduced from version 4.5, especially the implementation in the compiler.
