[Bug target/101116] missed peephole optimization not of bitwise and

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101116

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Take:
unsigned char foo(unsigned *i) {
    return !(*i & 1);
}

GCC and clang/LLVM produce similar code.  In fact similar to what GCC produces
before.

Note also ICC produces the same code as GCC for original case.  So does
Microsoft compiler.  So I think we can say this is not a missed optimization
for GCC.