https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100612

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan O'Connor <jonathan.oconnor at protonmail dot com> 
---
I was afraid you were going to say it's not a bug :-) That's why I reached out
to Nico, who was on the committee, and was one of the people who proposed
jthread.

My view, as a user, is that jthread should be a drop in replacement for thread,
with auto-joining and stop_token support.

I've just reread the descripton of jthread's constructor here:
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/jthread/jthread
and it does seem to explicitly exclude the behaviour I would like.

So, I have no problem with you closing this as not a bug.
Sorry for wasting your time. I guess, I'll have to write a committee proposal.

BTW, thanks for your all your work on g++ and the stdlib++. Much appreciated.

Reply via email to