https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100267
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu <crazylht at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3) > After support v{,p}expand* thats w/o mask operands, codegen seems to be > optimal > I was wrong, without mask, it's just simple move.