https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96416
--- Comment #18 from Giuseppe D'Angelo <dangelog at gmail dot com> --- Hello, (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #17) > (In reply to Giuseppe D'Angelo from comment #14) > > To summarize: > > > > * should a wording defect be raised against std::to_address(Ptr), to state > > that pointer_traits<Ptr> being well-formed is actually a prerequisite? > > I'd prefer if pointer_traits was just SFINAE friendly. I guess that's a reasonable thing to wish for, given I'm not the first falling for it; I hope I'll be the last :) > > * should LWG3446's resolution be amended? > > See https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3541 > > > * if there's going to be a GCC 10.3, is the commit above solving LWG3446 > > going to be cherry-picked into it? Otherwise, either one blacklists GCC 10, > > or has to specialize pointer_traits there as a workaround (?). > > It missed the 10.3 release, but it's on the gcc-10 branch as r10-9698, which > will be in GCC 10.4: > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32a859531e854382c18abf0b14a306d83f793eb5 > That also includes the fix for LWG 3541. Thank you very much for the new issue and the cherry-pick of the fix.
