https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100054

--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4)
> Fixed.  Apparently 90479 is the wrong PR number for the earlier change, I
> wonder what the correct one was.

Looks like it's PR90749

Reply via email to