https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99945
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=99959
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I misread the report: it's actually about a false negative in all the cases
where the warning isn't issued and not about it being issued with
-fsanitize=undefined in the one case where it is. Mentioning the name of an
artificial variable is certainly confusing, but I agree that warnings shouldn't
be suppressed for it when it's created as a substitute for a real variable.
That said, as the simpler test case case in pr99945 shows, warnings for the
FRAME variable were apparently already (perhaps inadvertently) suppressed in
r230968.
