https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68081
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Can this be closed as invalid? The program can't compile because it tries to
use something that doesn't exist, which is not a GCC bug.
(In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #7)
> I thought I was allowed to use documented functions; and I was not supposed
> to use undocumented ones. Yeah, this seems to be turned on its head :)
Many built-in functions are documented so that authors of other compilers and
other tools (like static analysis checkers) can implement the same thing in a
compatible way. That doesn't mean users are supposed to use them directly.
