https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97680
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <ja...@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0989e99470c2a6797bacf6d04888bc9a46a632a8 commit r11-7922-g0989e99470c2a6797bacf6d04888bc9a46a632a8 Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> Date: Wed Mar 31 08:55:38 2021 +0200 testsuite: Disable zero-scratch-regs-{8, 9, 10, 11}.c on all but ... [PR97680] Seems the target hook is only defined on config/i386/i386.c:#undef TARGET_ZERO_CALL_USED_REGS config/i386/i386.c:#define TARGET_ZERO_CALL_USED_REGS ix86_zero_call_used_regs config/sparc/sparc.c:#undef TARGET_ZERO_CALL_USED_REGS config/sparc/sparc.c:#define TARGET_ZERO_CALL_USED_REGS sparc_zero_call_used_regs but apparently many of the tests actually succeed on various targets that don't define those hooks. E.g. I haven't seen them to fail on aarch64, on arm only the -10.c fails, on powerpc*/s390* all {8,9,10,11} fail (plus 5 is skipped on power*-aix*). On ia64 according to testresults {6,7,8,9,10,11} fail, some with ICEs. On mipsel according to testresults {9,10,11} fail, some with ICEs. On nvptx at least 1-9 succeed, 10-11 don't know, don't have assert.h around. I've kept {5,6,7} with aix,ia64,ia64 skipped because those seems like outliers, it works pretty much everywhere but on those. The rest have known good targets. 2021-03-31 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR testsuite/97680 * c-c++-common/zero-scratch-regs-6.c: Skip on ia64. * c-c++-common/zero-scratch-regs-7.c: Likewise. * c-c++-common/zero-scratch-regs-8.c: Change from dg-skip-if of selected unsupported triplets to all targets but selected triplets of supported targets. * c-c++-common/zero-scratch-regs-9.c: Likewise. * c-c++-common/zero-scratch-regs-10.c: Likewise. * c-c++-common/zero-scratch-regs-11.c: Likewise.
