https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96013

--- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9)
> > > Sometime the test ICE with
> > > 
> > > f951: internal compiler error: gfc_code2string(): Bad code
> > > 
> > > which cannot be fixed by the patch in comment 6.
> > > 
> >
> > Don't know anything about libsantize.  
> 
> The error has nothing to do with libsanitize.

So, then why are you posting incomprehensible garbage
from libsanitize, which may have absolutely nothing to
do with this patch.  The patch in comment #6 prevents
the segfault; thereby allowing f951 to continue with
the processing of the source code.

> It is generated by gfc_code2string in gcc/fortran/misc.c
> in a random manner.

I cannot reproduce your results. Without a method to
reproduce the issue and/or a complete backtrace with 
line numbers, I standby my assertion that the patch
in comment #6 fixes the segfault reported by Gerhard.
More importantly, it does not matter if the patch
fixes the segfault, because no one is going to commit
it anyway.

Reply via email to