[Bug fortran/99226] [11 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:10279

[burnus at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99226

--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> This is invalid and should have been rejected, when teams is nested in
> target, it must be the only thing nested in it, you can't have two teams
> directives nested in one target construct.

How is this enforceable at compile time for '!$omp target; call f(); call g()"
and then in f() and g() the teams?


The following C program compiles – without ICE and without error:

void
sub (int n)
{
  int i;
#pragma omp target
  {
    #pragma omp teams distribute dist_schedule (static,n+4)
    for (i = 0; i < 8; ++i)
      ;
    #pragma omp teams distribute dist_schedule (static,n+4)
    for (i = 0; i < 8; ++i)
      ;
  }
}


And the resulting omplower dump is:
          #pragma omp teams shared(n)
          __builtin_GOMP_teams (0, 0);
          {
            D.2077 = n + 4;
            {
              int i;

              #pragma omp distribute dist_schedule(static,D.2077) private(i)
              for (i = 0; i < 8; i = i + 1)
              #pragma omp continue (i, i)
              #pragma omp return(nowait)
            }
          }
          #pragma omp return(nowait)

while for Fortran the dump is
            #pragma omp teams shared(n)
            __builtin_GOMP_teams (0, 0);
            {
              {
                integer(kind=4) D.3932;

                D.3936 = *n;
                D.3932 = D.3936 + 4;
                {
                  integer(kind=4) i;

                  #pragma omp distribute dist_schedule(static,D.3932)
private(i)
                  for (i = 1; i <= 8; i = i + 1)
                  <D.3945>:
                  #pragma omp continue (i, i)
                  #pragma omp return(nowait)
                }
              }
            }
            #pragma omp return(nowait)