https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99139
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfirmed| |2021-02-17 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Priority|P3 |P4 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixes problem with original code. Not regression tested. diff --git a/gcc/fortran/match.c b/gcc/fortran/match.c index 2df6191d7e6..eb51b9905da 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/match.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/match.c @@ -6634,6 +6639,18 @@ gfc_match_select_rank (void) gfc_current_ns = gfc_build_block_ns (ns); m = gfc_match (" %n => %e", name, &expr2); + + /* If expr2 corresponds to an implicitly typed variable, then the actual + type of the variable may not have been resolved. Set it here. */ + if (!gfc_current_ns->seen_implicit_none + && expr2->expr_type == EXPR_VARIABLE + && expr2->ts.type == BT_UNKNOWN + && expr2->symtree && expr2->symtree->n.sym) + { + gfc_set_default_type (expr2->symtree->n.sym, 0, gfc_current_ns); + expr2->ts.type = expr2->symtree->n.sym->ts.type; + } + if (m == MATCH_YES) { expr1 = gfc_get_expr ();