https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98605

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I can't reproduce the original error reported in PR 82481 anyway. Maybe
clang-tidy got smarter (it doesn't show problems in system headers by default,
which helps).

Maybe we can just remove that code entirely.

Reply via email to