https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88767
--- Comment #15 from Jiu Fu Guo <guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14) > > I've only quickly tried to understand what you are proposing but I think > this is out-of scope of our "separate" distribution / interchange / > unroll-and-jam transforms but requires interaction of them. Which means > the theory is that the graphite based loop nest optimization should > catch this kind of locality transform. Which it for sure doesn't do > in it's current state (without checking). Hi Richard, thanks for your thoughts and great comments!
