https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96239

--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <ja...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a7553ad60bebc419d510564b8b9f9e5e03725ff5

commit r11-6470-ga7553ad60bebc419d510564b8b9f9e5e03725ff5
Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Jan 5 16:16:06 2021 +0100

    store-merging: Handle vector CONSTRUCTORs using bswap [PR96239]

    I've tried to add such helper, but handling over just analysis and letting
    each pass handle it differently seems complicated given the limitations of
    the bswap infrastructure.

    So, this patch just hooks the optimization also into store-merging so that
    the original testcase from the PR can be fixed.

    2021-01-05  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

            PR tree-optimization/96239
            * gimple-ssa-store-merging.c (maybe_optimize_vector_constructor):
New
            function.
            (get_status_for_store_merging): Don't return BB_INVALID for blocks
            with potential bswap optimizable CONSTRUCTORs.
            (pass_store_merging::execute): Optimize vector CONSTRUCTORs with
bswap
            if possible.

            * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr96239.c: New test.
  • [Bug tree-optimization/96239] F... cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

Reply via email to