https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98461

--- Comment #8 from Denis Yaroshevskiy <denis.yaroshevskij at gmail dot com> ---
Thank you for the fast fix.

I can already see that the code is in trunk and works for both 256 and 128 bit
registers.

256: https://godbolt.org/z/5sT48f
128: https://godbolt.org/z/Exo3d9

I am a bit confused as to why 128 bit codegen differs in two cases but both
seem to be reasonable at glance.

Reply via email to