https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97827
Fangrui Song <i at maskray dot me> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |i at maskray dot me
--- Comment #9 from Fangrui Song <i at maskray dot me> ---
I want to know whether this is really a wontfix on GCC's side.
Richard Sandiford on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/559572.html
"I'm not saying we should bend over backwards to support difficult
quirks. But here we're talking about a choice between (a) doing
something that works “everywhere” unconditionally (and keeping things
simple) vs. (b) having both code that takes a shortcut and code that
doesn't take a shortcut and trying to predict which one we should do."
This makes a lot of sense to me. For the LLVM "fix", we had not known this PR
before https://reviews.llvm.org/D92052#2452577
To me personally, I might have a different opinion if I knew this is not an
entire dead end on gcc -S output.
