https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96245
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Effectively it would be the inverse of jump threading optimization, though I
think we don't do it for switches, turning say:
void
foo (int *p, int x)
{
switch (x)
{
case 7:
case 8:
case 9:
case 10:
case 11:
case 12: *p = 12 + x; break;
default: return;
}
}
into the above foo.
