https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96147
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- > --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- [...] > For now can you confirm the FAILs persist? I'll have to dig in with a > cross... The FAILs (and XPASSes) are still exactly as reported. There's also gcc211 in the cfarm, but I'd expect a cross to be considerably faster...
