https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97899

--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill <ja...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92a30040c8d3ea4899979ec41a7e8e6a625c438d

commit r11-5323-g92a30040c8d3ea4899979ec41a7e8e6a625c438d
Author: Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Nov 20 16:50:20 2020 -0500

    c++: ICE with int{} in template. [PR97899]

    split_nonconstant_init_1 was confused by a CONSTRUCTOR with non-aggregate
    type, which (with COMPOUND_LITERAL_P set) we use in a template to represent
    a braced functional cast.  It seems to me that there's no good reason to do
    split_nonconstant_init at all in a template.

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            PR c++/97899
            * typeck2.c (store_init_value): Don't split_nonconstant_init in a
            template.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            PR c++/97899
            * g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-template3.C: New test.

Reply via email to