https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97743
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2020-11-06 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 Component|tree-optimization |middle-end Target| |x86_64-*-* --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- But is it really faster? movzbl %dil, %eax imull $743, %eax, %eax vs. negb %dil sbbl %eax, %eax andl $743, %eax clang9 produces testl %edi, %edi movl $743, %eax # imm = 0x2E7 cmovel %edi, %eax more like a middle-end/RTL expansion transform, target dependent.