https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96269
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to sshannin from comment #6) > I guess to rephrase, should there also be a specialized spaceship overload > for the (nullopt_t, optional) direction to complement the (optional, > nullopt) one? No, the compiler synthesizes it from operator==(optional, nullopt_t) by reversing the arguments. That's how comparisons work in C++20.
