https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97432
--- Comment #2 from Ray Zhang <peifeng2005 at gmail dot com> --- Hi, I actually spoke with Richard Smith about the same ticket (since clang was also involved in the comparison here), and I found that if we were conforming to the draft, the first case should also fail to compile. The discussion is linked [here](https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47848). The issue now is that passing -pedantic-errors into GCC still allows for the first case to pass. This shouldn't work since we find one such qual conv to fail (const int vs. int).
