https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97388
David Stone <david at doublewise dot net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |david at doublewise dot net
--- Comment #1 from David Stone <david at doublewise dot net> ---
This seems like it could be the same issue. The following code should be
rejected, but it's accepted.
```
#include <algorithm>
struct S {
int * m_ptr;
constexpr S():
m_ptr(new int)
{
}
S(const S&) = delete;
S& operator=(const S&) = delete;
constexpr ~S() {
delete m_ptr;
}
};
constexpr bool test(S v) {
v.m_ptr = nullptr;
return true;
}
static_assert(test(S()));
```
Here, we have a memory leak that fails to be reported. It seems like changes to
by-value function parameters are not maintained for the destructor?
