https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40770
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- IIRC cepxi has the complication that we have to define the mangling for vector _Complex double. But cexpi is what the vectorizer currently sees, of course (we can of course vectorize it as sincos with arguments in memory again). So yeah, glibc is lacking here. Can one actually define multiple OMP SIMD variants for a single function?
