https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96991
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Note, the testcase would need to require int128 effective target or even > sync_int_128_runtime, ensure linking with -latomic on offloading targets > that need it (unless we handle it automatically), but also as I said, it > contains just 3 randomly chosen atomics. > Would be nice to have more complete test coverage of the atomics, like > having one test per basic atomic size (char, short, int, long long, int128) > and in each test at least most of the __atomic* and __sync_* builtins that > are out there. > See e.g. gcc.dg/atomic*.c and gcc.dg/sync*.c. Perhaps use macros to avoid > too many repetitions. For now, I'm going to commit without test-case. I've tried for a while to make something that does not depend on libatomic, but didn't manage. And I didn't manage to xfail the resulting link failure due to no libatomic support in a way that doesn't also xfail the ICE. So, to be revisited once libatomic support for nvptx has been committed.
