https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96839
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Priority|P3 |P4
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2020-08-29
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
With GCC10 and 11 the errors are
pr96839.f90:47:38:
47 | common_bits = min(self % bits, set2 % bits)
| 1
Error: Expected argument list at (1)
pr96839.f90:57:25:
57 | bits = self % bits
| 1
Error: Expected argument list at (1)
pr96839.f90:25:17:
25 | procedure, pass(self) :: bits
| 1
Error: Procedure 'bits' at (1) has the same name as a component of 'bitset_t'
With GCC7 to GCC9 the first error is replaced with
pr96839.f90:47:14:
47 | common_bits = min(self % bits, set2 % bits)
| 1
Error: Syntax error in COMMON statement at (1)
Could this PR be considered as FIXED?
