https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96750
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > after: > 1794240.0 > > before: > 1802710.0 That's less than 1% of difference (with "after" better than "before"), not the 10% regression claimed, maybe there is another relevant commit?
