https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96661
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2020-08-17 2:10 p.m., burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > I do not see an easy way out; we had the same issue before with GCN and there > the solution was to add support for int128, cf. PR 96306. While this probably is possible, there is no library support for __int128. I guess as long as the "long long" type still maps to a 64-bit int this might be okay.
