https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96494

--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0)
> AFAICT, from the point of view of the PTX isa, there's no reason why we
> couldn't support this.
> 
> So, unless a testsuite run points to some problem, we should enable the
> sync_int_long for nvptx.

Well, I found a problem with test-case gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr86314.c.

There we try to do an atomic insn on stack, and since stack is implemented as
.local, and the atom insn is not supported for .local, we run into:
...
 nvptx-run: error getting kernel result: operation not supported on
global/shared address space
...

Something like this would work:
...
$ git diff
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr86314.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr86314.c
index 8962a3cf2ff..565fb02eee2 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr86314.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr86314.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 // PR target/86314
-// { dg-do run { target sync_int_long } }
+// { dg-do run { target sync_int_long_stack } }
 // { dg-options "-O2" }

 __attribute__((noinline, noclone)) unsigned long
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index e79015b4d54..a870b1de275 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
@@ -7704,7 +7704,16 @@ proc check_effective_target_sync_int_long { } {
             || [istarget cris-*-*]
             || ([istarget sparc*-*-*] && [check_effective_target_sparc_v9])
             || ([istarget arc*-*-*] && [check_effective_target_arc_atomic])
-            || [check_effective_target_mips_llsc] }}]
+            || [check_effective_target_mips_llsc]
+            || [istarget nvptx*-*-*]
+        }}]
+}
+
+proc check_effective_target_sync_int_long_stack { } {
+    return [check_cached_effective_target sync_int_long_stack {
+      expr { ![istarget nvptx*-*-*]
+            && [check_effective_target_sync_int_long]       
+        }}]
 }

 # Return 1 if the target supports atomic operations on "char" and "short".
...

Reply via email to