https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96385
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I also wonder if the result of the patch,
34: 0000000000000000 0 NOTYPE WEAK HIDDEN 1 t.c.5958f17d
35: 0000000000000000 0 NOTYPE WEAK HIDDEN UND t.c.5958f17d
36: 0000000000000000 0 NOTYPE WEAK HIDDEN UND t.c.5958f17d
37: 0000000000000000 0 NOTYPE WEAK HIDDEN UND t.c.5958f17d
is in any way "safer" from an ELF perspective (not so much GNU ld since
we've dealt with Solaris and HP-UX linker issues in the past).
Alan, you fiddled with this earlier so any comments?
