https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96237
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2020-07-19
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
if (x & 16)
a |= 2;
Maybe should be transformed into:
a |= ((x >> 4) & 0x1) << 1;
Which in turn should be transformed into:
a |= ((x & 0x10) >> 3);
if (x & 32)
a |= 4;
gets transformed into:
a |= ((x & 0x20) >> 3);
And:
a |= ((x & 0x40) >> 3);
a |= ((x & 0x20) >> 3);
Into:
a |= ((x & 0x60) >> 3);
Or:
a |= ((x >> 3) & 0x6);
Combine that with:
a = (x >> 3) & 1;
gets us:
a |= ((x >> 3) & 0x7);
Hopefully I did that correctly.
