https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #48886|0 |1
is obsolete| |
Attachment #48889|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 48891
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48891&action=edit
another try
Sorry about the bugs in the previous patch.
Besides integrating your s/_1/_list/ fix (thanks), I understood why you needed
the [set $opts], but the intended logic was to have a [set $i] in the previous
line. I didn't know about this use for "set", though; I would have gone for
"eval set opts \$$i" instead. I liked set opts [set $i] much better. Thanks
for cluing me into it!
Would you be so kind as to confirm that this slightly modified version still
works for you, and that I didn't miss any of your changes?
Thanks,
