https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96015
--- Comment #22 from Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox at inbox dot ru> --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #17) > For me tree optimized dump is correct, so likely a target issue. Yeah, I agree. I finally understood why memory loads disappear (duh!). > @Sergei: Is GCC 9 working properly? > Would it be possible to bisect that? gcc-9 seems to work, bu I'm not sure if it's intentional or unrelated optimization passes change the code enough. I'll try to cook up even smaller example given that -fno-delayed-branch seems to be a culprit and then bisect gcc.
