https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95693
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The Derived ctor seems to first perform zero initialization of the base for some reason and only then calls the Base constructor. Dunno if that is required or not, but since Alex' change actually also zeroes the reference. And this state before calling the Base is caught by the sanitizer. So, to me it looks like a C++ FE problem that it zero initializes it first, or if it needs to, then it needs to either avoid what Alex' patch is doing (do that only during error-recovery), or arrange somehow that it will not be sanitized.
