https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87291
--- Comment #23 from bouanto at zoho dot com --- Created attachment 48685 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48685&action=edit Example of global assembly See answers below. (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #22) > Created attachment 48684 [details] > Updated work-in-progress patch which adds "asm goto" support > > Here's an updated version of the patch which adds "asm goto" support. grep > for test_i386_basic_asm_3a to see an example. > > Also uploaded to: > https://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/gcc/2020-06-05/0001-FIXME-WIP-on-extended- > asm-support-v2.patch > > Does this API make sense? Yes, now I understand what you meant. The API looks good. > I could use a concrete example of what you might use in C. > An issue is ordering: in C, these top-level statements presumably are ordered > relative to each other and the function bodies, based on the order they're > seen > by the parser (though I'm guessing here). Would something similar happen > based > on the order of calls to gcc_jit_context_new_function? I attached an example of global assembly. I don't understand the ordering issue. I also don't understand how gcc_jit_context_new_function is used here.
