https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95111
--- Comment #5 from Avi Kivity <a...@cloudius-systems.com> --- This snippet from cppreference: If the coroutine is a non-static member function, such as task<void> my_class::method1(int x) const;, its Promise type is std::coroutine_traits<task<void>, const my_class&, int>::promise_type implies that both gcc and my interpretation are wrong. gcc passes a pointer for the lambda, and I'd like the lambda to be passed by value. The difference between gcc and cppreference is trivial, and both of them make coroutine lambdas unusable if they contain state and if the lambda is asynchronous.
