https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94838
Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Gabriel Ravier from comment #0)
> int f(bool b, int *p)
> {
> return b && *p;
> }
>
> GCC generates this with -O3:
>
> f(bool, int*):
> xor eax, eax
> test dil, dil
> je .L1
> mov edx, DWORD PTR [rsi]
> xor eax, eax ; This can be removed, since eax is already 0 here
> test edx, edx
> setne al
> .L1:
> ret
The first xor is return value load and the second is from peephole2 pass that
converts:
11: NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK 3
12: flags:CCZ=cmp([si:DI],0)
REG_DEAD si:DI
13: NOTE_INSN_DELETED
32: ax:QI=flags:CCZ!=0
REG_DEAD flags:CCZ
33: ax:SI=zero_extend(ax:QI)
to:
11: NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK 3
40: {ax:SI=0;clobber flags:CC;}
43: dx:SI=[si:DI]
44: flags:CCZ=cmp(dx:SI,0)
42: strict_low_part(ax:QI)=flags:CCZ!=0
The follow-up cprop-hardreg pass does not notice that we already have zero
loaded to a register.
There is nothing that target-dependent part can do here. A follow-up RTL
hardreg propagation pass should fix this.