https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94823
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note there are two loops here where we could have an issue but ....
In the first loop, it is ok usage because __k will be only 0 when the array
will be filled with the same data (0x8b8b8b8bu) so that usage does not matter.
The second loop is where it might matter but __k will never be 0 as __m is will
either be greater than or equal to __n.
