https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94810
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Maybe you misunderstood comment 3, the construction order is only unspecified when you use __attribute__((constructor)). If you just create normal global objects using normal C++ the order within a single translation unit is completely specified, and your program would work as expected. So again, why can't you just use standard C++ instead of attributes that aren't needed in C++, and proposing non-conforming changes to the compiler?
