https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94789
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Maybe (-b)&31 instead? And then the &31 could optimized out later on?
- [Bug tree-optimization/94789] New: Failure to t... gabravier at gmail dot com
- [Bug target/94789] Failure to take advanta... rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug target/94789] Failure to take advanta... pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug target/94789] Failure to take advanta... gabravier at gmail dot com
- [Bug target/94789] Failure to take advanta... wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
