https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94747
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to AK from comment #0)
> Integer overflow reported by asan with the following stack trace.
asan?! Are you sure?
As Jakub says, this is probably the dumb "unsigned-integer-overflow" sanitizer,
which is dumb because unsigned integers can't overflow by definition (they
wrap) and because that wrapping is never undefined.
The code is fine.
